You can see a few of the tested games below. Intel chose 1920×1080 resolution for this comparison. These are geometric averages based on 17 gaming tests, mostly at Ultra and High settings. A770M is from RTX 3060 12% better performance will show.
The only deduction that can be made from the performance values is that Intel Arc A770M competes with the RTX 3060 laptop version, and Intel Arc A730M competes with the RTX 3050 Ti desktop version. Therefore, when the graphics cards are on the market or when others examine them, we can come across slightly different figures in terms of performance.
Data is currently only Chinese appraisals Collected from the official Review Guide available for use. It does not store any personal data.Intel has shared official gaming performance values for its A770M and A730M GPUs based on the Alchemist ACM-G10 GPU. The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. Performance is expected to land between the GeForce GTX 1650 and GTX 1650 SUPER but with raytracing capabilities. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". Intel Arc Graphics Cards Get ‘VRAM Self-Refresh’ Feature In Latest Linux Drivers. Last week was a historic moment for Intel because it launched its first desktop graphics card, the Intel Arc A380 aimed at the entry range, being a basic GPU with which to take its first steps before launching more powerful models to compete with mid-range GPUs from NVIDIA and AMD. This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. First independent tests of the Intel Arc A380 show mixed results. The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. It features an ACM-G11 chip with 8 Xe cores at 2.45 GHz along with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 96-bit memory bus to deliver 15.5 Gbps bandwidth. Intel’s A380 is an entry-level GPU that is likely to be released only in the Asian or Indian market.
#Intel graphics card drivers
The reason for this gap must be the poor integration of Intel drivers with games, something that Intel, used to being the one who dictates the rules, is going to find hard to accept: they will have to work hand in hand with developers until their cards perform with the same finesse as those of AMD or Nvidia. However, below we can see a comparison with different games like GTA V or League of Legends (thanks, Google Lens) in which we can see how the performance of the Arc A380 is lower than the AMD RX 6400 or the NVIDIA GTX 1650, a curious fact given the difference in the 3DMark tests. 3D Mark Intel Arc A380 TimeSpyįirst of all, as you can see above, Intel’s A380 is the second most powerful graphics card in 3DMark’s Port Royal and Time Spy benchmarks, obtaining much better results than AMD’s graphics cards and NVIDIA’s GTX 1650, being surpassed only by the RTX 3050. These tests have been performed using a computer with a mid-range Intel Core i5-12400 processor along with DDR4 RAM, comparing the Intel Arc A380 with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 and a GTX 1650, while on the AMD side we find in the comparison the Radeon RX 6400 and Radeon RX 6500 XT.
A few hours ago a Chinese portal called Shenmedounengce published the first independent performance tests with this first desktop GPU from Intel (specifically with a model of the A380 assembled by Gunnir), offering quite disparate results between what appears in the 3DMark benchmark with the performance after the games, something that may be influenced by the drivers of the graphics card that has been one of the reasons why Intel delayed it for a few weeks.
0 kommentar(er)
